AnalysisDemocracyFeaturesNorth AmericaPoliticsWorld

Abusing the Filibuster Ensures Its Abolition

Perverting extended debate into endless debate corrodes the basic principle of self-government, the right of people to form majorities for or against particular policies.

Arguments over the filibuster veer toward an unproductive choice: kill it or keep it.

  • Alton Frye
  • The National Interest

The rational choice lies between extended debate and endless debate.

Those who care most about retaining the filibuster need to recognize the distinction and act on it responsibly. Passage of the 1968 Fair Housing Law illustrates that extended debate can be fruitful.

It can produce better policy and broader consensus.

Refusal by the Senate to invoke cloture—ending debate under the…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button